CustomHealthPlans

Archive for October, 2010

Expect Changes to your Texas Health Insurance

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

expect changes to texas health insuranceOn September 23, several changes to Texas health insurance plans went into effect.  The changes influence everything from maximum payout policies to preexisting condition policies to eligibility requirements, but perhaps the most important amendment to our health care system is the government’s mandate for how insurers must calculate their “medical loss ratios.”

Medical loss ratios are calculated by taking the amount an insurer spends on the health care of its customers, and dividing by the amount an insurer collects in premiums.  The new health care law mandates that individual and small business insurance plans must spend at least 80 percent of their collected premiums on health care, while large employer plans (defined as just 50 or more employees) must spend at least 85 percent of premiums on health care.  On the surface, it may sound consumer friendly, but once you dig into the details, the implications are frightening.

First, how does the government discern funds used for health care versus funds used for other purposes?  If protecting consumers against fraud and working with doctors to assure smooth alignment of medical records is considered administrative and not an “activity that improves health care quality,” then insurers will have to eat those costs (unlikely), pass them onto consumers (likely) or stop the activities altogether (also likely).

Certain states are already pleading with the federal government to waive or delay the medical loss ratio rules, but the law’s language gives regulators little flexibility in waiving the MLR requirements, which must be in effect by January 1, 2011.

Such guidelines put affordable Texas health insurance plans in jeopardy, as insurers have only a few months to cut large portions of their budget.  An insurers’ first goal should be patient protection, but many patient-oriented activities are in danger of being scrapped to account for the government-imposed MLR requirements.  And adding to the confusion, the status of Texas health savings accounts is unknown, as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ignored HSAs when drafting the guidelines.

We’ve known for awhile now that big changes are looming for health insurance.  Some just went into effect, and more are on the way.  Let’s hope that once the dust settles, affordable Texas health insurance is still an option for us all.

High Risk Texas Health Insurance Pool Off to Slow Start

Thursday, October 14th, 2010

High Risk Texas Health Insurance Off to Slow StartOne of the most talked about pieces of federal health care legislation has been the administrations’ pledge to provide affordable health insurance to those with preexisting conditions that previously made them uninsurable.  The Preexisting Condition Insurance Plan is now up and running, but so far it’s not living up to expectations.

According to Newsmax, enrollment has lagged across the country, and even though the plan provides cheaper insurance to those in need, it’s still not cheap.  High premiums are likely a reason for slow adoption into the federal and state run high risk pools.

Economists originally projected that about 375,000 people would gain coverage this year, but as of early September, Texas had only enrolled about 200 people into the Texas health insurance high risk pool, and California has enrolled about 450.  For those who get into the program, the coverage can be a life saver, providing treatment for a fraction of the actual costs.  But the price is still too high for many, and specific enrollment requirements make other people ineligible.

In reviewing the Preexisting Condition Insurance Plan, state officials and independent experts raised some concerns:

Premiums may still be too high – The high risk pools significantly reduce costs, but individuals are still left paying high deductibles and premiums that can range upwards of $500 per month.  These costs are simply too much for many people to absorb.

Eligibility requirements – The plan requires that enrollees be uninsured for at least six months prior to applying, and that they were previously turned down by an insurer.  Many people in need of coverage don’t meet these requirements.

Prescription drug coverage – In states where the federal government runs the program directly, the plan doesn’t provide coverage for prescription drugs until people meet a $2,500 annual deductible. The high costs can be a significant barrier to consumers accessing the medications they need.

The program will last until 2014, when the reforms require that insurers accept all applicants regardless of medical history.  Until then, there are obviously some kinks to be worked out as we try to move toward affordable Texas health insurance for our state and accessible coverage for all Americans.

ObamaCare Halts Health Insurance from Texas to Iowa

Sunday, October 10th, 2010

affordable health insurance texasAs Obama’s health insurance legislation continues to roll out, we’ve seen Texas health insurance companies close and other insurers drop coverage they could no longer afford to offer.  Federal health care reform isn’t just affecting Texas health insurance plans, of course, as negative reactions are taking place all across the country.

Last week President Obama was in Iowa to espouse his administration’s policies, including the increasingly unpopular health care law.  As we’ve been hearing since before the legislation went into effect, Obama reiterated that individuals won’t have to change their insurance plan if they like the one they’ve got.  In fact, according to Virginia Right, Obama said, “There’s nothing in the bill that says you have to change the health insurance that you’ve got right now…If you’ve got health care through your employer, that’s not going to change, except to make it a little bit safer and more secure.”

But The New York Times reported last week that The Principal Financial Group, an Iowa-based company that provides coverage to about 840,000 people, announced that it planned to stop selling health insurance.  This is yet another sign of the backlash and upheaval emerging among insurers as the new federal health law starts to take effect.

So despite the President assuring Iowans that they can keep the health insurance they currently have, 840,000 people in that state won’t be able to keep their plan.  This isn’t just happening in Iowa or Texas; it’s happening all over the country, as insurers find ObamaCare’s strict regulations too imposing to meet.

Congressional Republicans proposed some alternatives to ObamaCare, but for now, at least, we’re in the middle of it.  Several reforms have already gone into effect, while many more will roll out over the next several years. We’ll keep watching and waiting to see how the monumental legislation will affect peoples’ ability to get affordable health insurance in Texas and other states across the nation.

Health Care Reform Linked to Doctor Shortage

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

health care reforms worsen doctor shortageHealth care reform is shouldering a lot of blame these days, from increasing our Texas health insurance costs to imposing such strict measures that insurers are forced to drop coverage for millions of Americans.  But last week, a new study by the Association of American Medical Colleges’ Center for Workforce Studies shows that health care legislation will exacerbate the current doctor shortage.  Estimates show that shortages would be 50 percent worse in 2015 than originally forecast as millions of new patients seek care.  From the study –

While previous projections showed a baseline shortage of 39,600 doctors in 2015, current estimates bring that number closer to 63,000, with a worsening of shortages through 2025…The United States already was struggling with a critical physician shortage and the problem will only be exacerbated as 32 million Americans acquire health care coverage, and an additional 36 million people enter Medicare.

Adding millions of uninsured Americans to the health insurance rolls sounds great, but our system isn’t ready to handle the augmented load.  The Association of American Medical Colleges calls for the administration to increase funding to train new doctors, as we face a shortage that includes a lack of specialists in fields like oncology, cardiology and emergency care.

The market dictates that when supply doesn’t meet demand, costs rise and the goods—in this case, doctors—are more difficult to obtain for consumers.  While insuring more Americans is certainly a good thing, the dearth of doctors is another example of the administration’s myopic desire to push through reforms without considering the consequences.

Health Care Alternatives to ObamaCare

Friday, October 1st, 2010

Since ObamaCare—the administration’s $1 trillion health care plan—was passed in March, Democrats have lauded its passage as a step toward health care utopia, while Republicans have admonished it as unsustainable and fiscally irresponsible.  Perhaps more important than either side’s political posturing has been the American public’s general disapproval of the legislation.  Now, in an attempt to combat ObamaCare and offer real ideas for positive change, Congressional Republicans last week unveiled their “Pledge to America,” which promises to repeal and replace Obamacare with “commonsense, fiscally sustainable health care reforms that will improve health care and expand access to affordable health insurance.”

The Pledge would start by repealing ObamaCare and replacing it with interstate insurance competition, reforming medical malpractice, expanding health savings accounts and improving high risk pools for people with pre-existing health conditions. But FoxNews.com states that Republicans should do more by promoting a bipartisan agenda that will fortify our country’s leadership in biomedical innovation.  The article suggests –

By creating a better climate for medical innovation today, policymakers will reap huge dividends from more high paying biotech jobs, new cures for life-threatening diseases, and new treatments that will help Americans remain healthier and more productive as they age – reducing the strain on government programs like Social Security and Medicare.

U.S. leadership in biomedical innovation is waning—in part because of prohibitive regulations—while countries like China and India are rapidly advancing in this field.  To reestablish global superiority in biomedical innovation, which can positively impact our nation’s health care and treatment options, the authors suggest the government undertake the following measures:

Tax reform – The U.S. corporate tax rate is the world’s highest at nearly 40 percent. This kills American job growth by encouraging companies to outsource.  Reducing this tax rate would be a potent incentive for companies to invest in biotech and medical jobs in the U.S.

Retain scientific talent – Our universities educate and train some of the world’s brightest students, only to ship them back to their original countries after college. To stay competitive in these fields, we must retain these students, perhaps by offering green cards to those who earn a master’s degree or Ph.D. in hard sciences like biology and chemistry.

Modernize the FDA – There is currently a huge gap between advances in science and the number of innovative and effective drugs coming to market.  FDA regulation and approval of new drugs is cumbersome and outdated, making it cost prohibitive for many drug makers to generate new medicines.  Modernizing how we evaluate drugs so that more companies can participate in the field will promote innovation and competition in the marketplace.  And budget increases to renovate the FDA can be offset in ways that promote health like, for example, slashing agriculture subsidies for corn byproducts that inundate our grocery stores with junk food.

While such measures aren’t the traditional means to reform health care, they are measures that promote innovation and competition, strong market forces which naturally lower costs.  The FoxNews authors close their thoughts, noting:

By expanding their definition of health care reform to include a comprehensive innovation agenda, Republicans can attract support from Democrats and independents for maintaining U.S. leadership in a critical economic sector. Better yet, they can offer hope to millions of patients suffering from chronic and life-threatening illnesses that have few good treatment options today.