CustomHealthPlans

Archive for January, 2011

The Economics of Health Care Reform

Monday, January 31st, 2011

texas health insuranceProponents of health care reform have promised that it will provide affordable health insurance in Texas and across the country. There’s no doubt that the new legislation will help certain individuals, but what often goes unsaid is that health care reform will also hurt a large percentage of the people that it’s intended to protect. According to John Goodman of the National Center for Policy Analysis, much of this is owed to the “top down” practice of implementing health care reform.

“Top down” means that reform starts with a goal or an idea, and the individuals in charge attempt to impose this idea onto all the people below. Top down thinking doesn’t consider what the masses want.  It ignores the fact that people will act in their own self interest, rather than in the interests of the government’s collectivist vision.

John Goodman writes:  “Almost everybody in health policy thinks you can have a plan designed by people at the top that will work, even though every doctor, every nurse, every hospital administrator and 310 million patients all have an economic self-interest in defeating the plan.

Below, Goodman notes some examples that he believes will play out, as people act in the interest of their own health and finances.

  • Thirty-two million otherwise uninsured people will try to double their consumption of medical care.
  • Almost everyone with private insurance and all Medicare enrollees will try to increase their consumption of preventive services, promised without deductible or copayment.
  • With no increase in supply, doctors and patients will face a huge rationing problem.
  • There will be up to 900,000 additional emergency room visits and the time price of care (rationing by waiting) will jump substantially
  • Patients whose plans pay below-market rates, including the elderly, the disabled and poor families on Medicaid, will be pushed to the rear of the waiting lines.

Goodman goes on to note that Congress passed a law that encourages middle and upper income families to have more insurance than they want or need. Assuming this segment of society utilizes the insurance they were forced to buy, they’ll in effect make access to health care more difficult for the poorest and most vulnerable segments of society. So whether consumers are looking to purchase health insurance in Texas or anywhere else, the top down methods used to expand our access to health care will actually hinder adoption by the people who need it most.

Politician Proposes Texas Health Insurance Exchange

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011

texas health insurance exchangeFollowing the March 2010 passage of health care reform, health insurance in Texas and across the country was dramatically changed. One big change that affects how consumers buy health insurance in general involves publically run exchanges on both the federal and state level. Rather than just buying insurance from private companies, whether through an employer or on your own, these exchanges would allow people to purchase government-backed health insurance policies.

Texas has been slow to react, as the state generally dismisses health care reform as an abuse of government power and one that negatively affects the nation’s economic well being.  But one politician is attempting to create a Texas-run exchange rather than subject Texans to the federal plan options. State Representative John Zerwas, a republican from Katy, TX, wants to create a Texas health insurance “connector,” or simplified insurance market, that would supersede our state’s adherence to the federal plan.

“My opposition to the federal health care reforms is no secret, and I continue to support Attorney General Greg Abbott’s efforts to have the law declared unconstitutional,” said Zerwas. “But the ‘connector concept’ has been around for decades and did not originate with Obamacare…Quite frankly, it is something that we should consider on its own merits regardless of the fate of the federal reforms.”

The state-run market would, in theory, make it easier for consumers to compare standard coverage plans, and also help to dole out federal subsidies to low income individuals and families in need of affordable Texas health insurance.

Zerwas’ plan would supplement, not replace, the private Texas health insurance market.  He says that major lobby groups comprised of doctors, hospitals and big businesses endorse the program, which would be overseen by board members ranging from health professionals to consumers and businesses.

It’s yet to be seen how all this will play out, but establishing state control over the exchange may be a better option than leaving it in the hands of the federal government, which to this point has not engendered much confidence in its handling of health care policies.

2010 Health Insurance: Year in Review

Saturday, January 1st, 2011

texas health insurance year in reviewOver the course of 2010, many measures were passed that significantly affected health insurance in Texas and across the country.  Below we take a look back at some of these monumental changes.

March 2010

Health Care Reform Passes
Despite no Republican support and tenuous public support, Democrats used their majority and a political tactic called reconciliation to jam the bill through Congress.  In the final roll call, no House Republican voted for the bill, and 34 House Democrats voted no.

April 2010

America Says “Repeal That Bill”
Shortly after the health care reform bill was passed, a Rasmussen Reports poll showed that 58% of Americans favored repealing the bill. Stated reasons included frustration with how Democrats handled the measure, and worry that it would be a severe financial burden for America.

May 2010

Corporations Consider Dropping Health Insurance Coverage
Under Obama’s new law, many businesses can save money by dropping employee health insurance and paying fines instead. Reports showed that companies, including Dallas-based AT&T, were calculating the benefits of potentially discontinuing their health insurance programs, which would leave thousands of workers uninsured.

August 2010

America’s Introduction to “Medical Loss Ratio”
As people began to digest the new law, reports showed that much of the bill hinged on how health insurance companies met something called a “medical loss ratio.” This meant that 80 to 85 percent of a health plan’s premiums must be spent on what the government considers to be “medical services” or “activities that improve health care quality.”  In effect, this law gave the government the power to force private companies to make business decisions based on regulations rather than on what’s best for the company or its customers’ health.

September 2010

Good News for Those with Pre-existing Conditions
Starting in September, all health plans were prohibited from dropping an individual’s coverage because he got sick. Children fared even better, as those under 19 years of age with pre-existing conditions could not be denied coverage by insurers.

ObamaCare Forces Texas Health Insurance Companies to Close
The cost burden of ObamaCare forced many health insurance companies to close up shop, including Grand Prairie-based National Health Insurance Company. It said that it could no longer offer insurance policies because of the company’s inability to meet requirements of the health care bill.

November 2010

Republicans Gain Ground in Midterm Elections
The Republicans won a sweeping victory in the House, one that political analysts called a referendum against the Obama administration.  Republican leaders stated their desire to repeal ObamaCare, and to start fresh with a new plan that lowers costs and raises quality.

It’s yet to be seen what 2011 has in store, but if it’s anything like 2010, it will certainly be interesting. Here’s hoping for a productive, prosperous and healthy new year.  Cheers!